Rapid Prototyping Services, Professional manufacturer of CNC Prototyping and 3D Prototyping in China. 

the best 3d printers for 2019

by:Tuowei     2019-08-15
Deven R.
Thomas Jefferson Law School and Steven Gerrard N Desay
Magliocca of Indiana University studies legal guidelines on how 3D home printers can change patent, copyright and trademark laws and even internet content rules.
Changes may be rapidly making three new printers to the world\'s copyright and intellectual property laws
Size objects at home and at work.
3D printing is usually the next step-
Purpose of calculation.
The technology is developing rapidly.
The cost of printers is falling, just like the cost of PCs when they reach homes and businesses of all sizes in the 1980 generation.
Editor\'s note: The author\'s complete research paper can be found here on the Social Science Research Network.
The new printer is able to print items made of plastic, metal and even composite chemicals, and the quality of printing is improving.
Designing software makes it easy to create a project and print it.
The scanner allows people without design skills to capture the outline of the object and print it out.
The technology seems so powerful that some groups may be in the name of protecting existing holders of intellectual property rights, or stop home printing of guns, or both.
We believe that these efforts are wrong.
Like the dawn of the digital age of copyright, we are at the dawn of digital things.
Like in previous times, 3D printing requires some legal protection so it can thrive and have the opportunity to reach its potential.
The promise of 3D printing is that people are free to make almost anything they want, which opens the door to a new round of innovation from the home --
And large companies.
If your daughter likes special toys that are not found in the store, then you can make them yourself.
If your customers all want items that suit their quirky tastes, then you can easily match their preferences.
If standardized parts do not meet the market demand, then you can
Produce many varieties effectively.
The simple ability to customize almost anything also opens the door for people with disabilities, seniors, or anyone who finds that their special needs are not met or can\'t afford them.
Some may question whether consumers are willing to accept these options.
However, Starbucks is now facing competition from Keurig and Coca.
Because technology brings a lot of coke.
Production technology of espresso and soda.
3D printing is expected to further promote this trend, especially in the field of patents.
Relying on the industry.
The patent law depends to some extent on the premise that the cost of infringement is relatively high, but 3D printing poses a challenge to this assumption.
The industrial revolution and intellectual property laws that support this economy are driven by economies of scale.
Support for research, production and distribution requires significant funding, so a significant amount of investment is also required for any serious infringement. That 19th-
The mode of the century is collapsing.
The canary in the coal mine is copyrighted.
As soon as music, movies and books are digitized, these industries will change.
Production costs have fallen.
Distribution becomes fast, cheap and onlinedemand.
Many new players enter the market.
Patents also started on this road.
In short, the rest of the economy has been digitized --
The economy of things.
Our research explores how 3D printing will disrupt patents and other forms of intellectual property that rely on physical restrictions to prevent infringement.
The current theory acknowledges that there is little chance that individuals or small businesses will start making infringing items from scratch, but a 3D printer will make it easier.
On the one hand, this shift will reduce the value of many patents, some copyrights and all trade clothing, because even if you do your best to prevent the proliferation of infringement, you will lose one . .
3D printing, on the other hand, should speed up design, prototyping, and startup and failure.
As a result, these devices offer specific opportunities to create and the benefits of many other Universal Devices
Objective technology: fast, unpredictable experiments, faster learning and knowledge growth.
As one author says, \"the new technology has inspired lyrical Utopia and melancholy cataclysm.
Whether 3D printing can achieve all the dreams it currently inspires is not a problem.
There is never an exact or accurate explanation of the results of a particular technology.
The benefits and costs of Edison\'s bulbs, nuclear reactors, Freon\'s use as coolant, and other technologies are unpredictable.
How 3D printing will dominate society has not yet been determined, but its rapid absorption at different levels of society suggests that some form of destruction is happening and growing.
We don\'t need to know how 3D printing will be maintained to know how existing companies will challenge the technology.
Part of the strategy is the requirement to restrict technology by law.
In short, the law plays a role in the possibility of any technical success and will play a role in 3D printing.
Therefore, we believe that unless Congress establishes a sensible regulatory system, namely :(1)
Eliminate the shadow of tort liability of persons using 3D printers for personal purposes; and (2)
Provide clear rules for websites hosting programs that allow these devices to run.
At the same time, companies with vested interests in the current system cannot use the fear of homemade guns as an excuse to bind 3D printing.
Without these changes, 3D printing could fall into a struggle to protect the old business model.
Wrong regulation can get caught up in path-dependent solutions where creators are told to use 3D printers only for certain purposes.
However, these changes balance the benefits and create space for 3D printing that needs to be the basis for the next wave of general printing
The purpose of calculation and creation.
Deven Desai, a law professor at Thomas Jefferson Law School, has just completed the work of Google\'s first academic research consultantGerard N.
Magioka is Samuel R.
Professor Robert H. Rosen, Indiana University
McKinney Law School.
Professor Magliocca is the author of three books and more than 20 articles on constitution and intellectual property rights.
Recent Constitutional Daily politicians have been hit in the latest polls: Craig, Chemerinsky debate whether the First Amendment protects hate speech on Facebook?
Constitutional inspection: Is the Supreme Court only willing to work on the margins of the Second Amendment?
rubber prototyping plastic components manufacturing process is liked by everyone and is used in every household.
Being a performance leader means Shenzhen Tuowei Model Technologies Co., Ltd. will achieve operational excellence, industry-leading customer satisfaction and superior financial performance.
Shenzhen Tuowei Model Technologies Co., Ltd. can assure that it is one of the best products in the market at present.
Offering a loyalty program not only makes customers feel valued, but it allows Shenzhen Tuowei Model Technologies Co., Ltd. to easily collect important information about customers.
There's the area of manufacturing cnc milling machine companies that's becoming very important. If you can create those things, you build this closed bond.
Custom message
Chat Online
Chat Online
Chat Online inputting...